Discussion about this post

User's avatar
EternalArt's avatar

I'd say a trilogy does NOT need explanations or recaps, because I've always considered a trilogy to be one story split into parts, a whole in three pieces. It always annoyed me to read explanations or recaps of things that I knew perfectly well because I had read the previous books.

If you package it as one long book, the recaps and explanations are not there because you consider that even though it is as far back in the story as it would be in a trilogy, because it is the "same book" now, it is clearer in the reader's head?

For me it is the same thing. I expect to be disagreed with on this though!

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts